I. Settlement Negotiations And Decisions

Alexander, Janet Cooper. (1991). Do The Merits Matter? A Study of Settlements in Securities Class Actions. Stanford Law Review, 43, 497.

Arrow, Kenneth, Mnookin, Robert H., & Ross, Lee (Eds.). (2006). Barriers To Conflict Resolution. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Baker, Tom and Griffith, Sean J. (2009). How the Merits Matter: D&O Insurance and Securities Settlements. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157, 755.

Bibas, Stephanos. (2004). Plea Bargaining Outside the Shadow of Trial. Harvard Law Review, 117(8), 2463.

Birke, Richard, and Fox, Craig R. (1999). Psychological Principles in Negotiating Civil Settlements. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 4, 1.

Chapman, Gretchen B. & Bornstein, Brian H. (1996). The More You Ask For The More You Get: Anchoring in Personal Injury Verdicts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 519, 525.

Coyne, William F. (1999). The Case for Settlement Counsel. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 14, 367.

Craver, Charles. (2002). The Intelligent Negotiator. Roseville, California: Prima Venture.

Eisenberg, Theodore, and Lanvers, Charlotte. (2009, March). What is the Settlement Rate and Why Should We Care? Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6(1), 111.

Farmer, Amy, Pecorino, Paul & Stango, Victor. (October 2004). The Causes of Bargaining Failure: Evidence From Major League Baseball. The Journal of Law and Economics, XLVII, 543.

Fisher, Roger & Ury, William. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. New York: Penguin Books USA

Fisher, Roger, and Shapiro, Daniel (2005). Beyond Reason, New York: Viking.

Freshman, Clark, et al. (2002). The Lawyer-Negotiator as Mood Scientist: What We Know And Don't Know About How Mood Relates To Successful Negotiation. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 1.

Galanter, M., and Cahill, M. (1994). Most Cases Settle: Judicial Promotion and Regulation of Settlements. Stanford Law Review, 46, 1353-1356.

Goldfien, Jeffrey H. and Robbennolt, Jennifer K. (2007). What If the Lawyers Have Their Way? An Empirical Assessment of Conflict Strategies and Attitudes Toward Mediation Styles. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 22, 277.

Goldstein, Noah, Martin, Steve, and Cialdini, Robert. (2008). Yes! New York: Free Press.

Gross, Samuel, & Syverud, Kent. (1996). Don't Try: Civil Jury Verdicts in a System Geared To Settlement. UCLA Law Review, 44(1), 51.

Gross, Samuel & Syverud, Kent. (1991). Getting to No: A Study of Settlement Negotiations and the Selection of Cases for Trial. Michigan Law Review, 90, 319.

Guthrie, Chris and Orr, Dan. (2006). Anchoring, Information, Expertise, and Negotiation: New Insights from Meta-Analysis. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 21, 597.

Guthrie, Chris and Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. (2006). Insurers, Illusions of Judgment & Litigation. Vanderbilt Law Review, Forthcoming; Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 06-28. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=952493

Hersch, Joni. (January 2006). Demand for a Jury Trial and the Selection of Cases for Trial. The Journal of Legal Studies, 35(1), 119.

Issacharoff, Samuel. (2002). The Content of Our Casebooks: Why Do Cases Get Litigated? Florida State University Law Review, 29, 1265.

Kiser, Randall, Asher, Martin, and McShane, Blakeley. (2008). Let’s Not Make a Deal: An Empirical Study of Decision Making in Unsuccessful Settlement Negotiations. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 5(3), 551-591.

Korobkin, Russell B. (Spring 2009). Who Wins in Settlement Negotiations? American Law and Economics Review, 11(1), 162-208. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1458794 or DOI: ahp004

Korobkin, Russell. (2006). Psychological Impediments to Mediation Success: Theory and Practice. Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution, 21, 281, 302.

Korobkin, Russell. (2003). The Endowment Effect and Legal Analysis. Northwestern University Law Review, 97, 1227

Korobkin, Russell. (2002). Aspirations and Settlement. Cornell Law Review, 88, 1.

Korobkin, Russell, and Guthrie, Chris. (1997). Psychology, Economics and Settlement: A New Look at the Role of the Lawyer. Texas Law Review, 76, 77.

Korobkin, Russell, and Guthrie, Chris. (1994). Psychological Barriers to Litigation Settlement: An Experimental Approach. Michigan Law Review, 93, 107.

Korobkin, Russell B., and Ulen, Thomas S. (2000). Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption From Law and Economics. California Law Review, 88(4), 1051.

Mayer, Bernard. (2000). The Dynamics of Conflict Resolution. New York: Jossey-Bass.

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie J. (1995). Whose Dispute Is It Anyway? A Philosophical and Democratic Defense of Settlement (in Some Cases). Georgetown Law Journal, 83, 2663-2696.

Kritzer, Herbert M., and Silbey, Susan (Eds.). (2003). In Litigation Do The "Haves" Still Come Out Ahead? Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

Malhotra, Deepack, and Bazerman, Max. (2007). Negotiation Genius. New York: Bantam Dell.

McCabe, Kevin, and Inglis, Laura. (2007, November 30). Using Neuroeconomics Experiments to Study Tort Reform. Arlington, Virginia: Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Mnookin, Robert H., et al. (2000). Beyond Winning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Moffitt, Michael L., and Bordone, Robert C. (Eds.). (2005). The Handbook of Dispute Resolution. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.

Myerson, Roger G. (1991). Game Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Philbin, Donald R. (2008). The One Minute Manager Prepares for Mediation: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Negotiation Preparation. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 13, 249.

Priest, George L. & Klein, Benjamin. (1984). The Selection of Disputes for Litigation. Journal of Legal Studies, 13, 1.

Priest, George L. (1985). Reexamining the Selection Hypothesis. Journal of Legal Studies, 14, 215.

Rachlinski, Jeffrey. (1996). Gains, Losses and the Psychology of Litigation. Southern California Law Review, 70, 113.

Spiegel, M. (1999). Lawyering and Client Decisionmaking: Informed Consent and the Legal Profession. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 128, 69.

Teitelbaum, Joshua C. (2007). A Unilateral Accident Model Under Ambiguity. The Journal of Legal Studies, 36(2), 431.

Zhong, Chenbo James. (2001, Fall). Group Heterogeneity and Team Negotiation. Kellogg Journal of Organization Behavior, p. 6.